Preparation 
Using the key phrases ‘Magnet status’, ‘Magnet recognition’, ‘benefits of Magnet status’, and ‘Magnet hospitals’, a literature search was done in CINAHL, Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition, and Medline databases. In addition the same phrases were used to search the World Wide Web.
Collaboration
      X and I began sharing and discussing sources, debate arguments, and presentation approaches at the very beginning of the debate preparation. This communication continued until the debate was complete. As partners, we acknowledged that this debate process was about learning, not winning. This understanding allowed for a spirit of partnership rather than adversary. 
Presentation 
      After reviewing debate process resources (Branham & Meany, 1998; Quinn, 2005;  World Debate Website, 2006), X and I decided to use a cross between a university and parliamentary debate style, where Professor X and fellow classmates were our audience. Our introduction, arguments and rebuttals were presented in the form of a word document speech, where each member was allowed to address ‘the house’ without interruption. We choose not to use power point presentation, as the detail of content would have been too hard to read on slides; either creating far too many slides or far too small a font size. Headings, font colour, pictures, and humour were used to illustrate and add clarity to the key points of the presentation speeches. We were careful to provide an unbiased definition of Magnet status in our introduction, favouring neither side. The particular arguments of my opponent were carefully addressed in the pro rebuttal, again illustrated with pictures and humour.
Facilitation

      The presentation components were posted in a timely manner, allowing classmates adequate time to digest and respond to each presentation. X and I agreed upon presentation posting times to ensure a coordinated process. I was careful to be present in the discussions on a daily basis, responding where appropriate. I was also careful to show respect for classmate’s perspectives, and value and learn from their contributions. 
What did I learn? 
      This was my very first debate experience, so not only did I learn about current issues in health care, but learned how to prepare and conduct a debate process.
What Would I Change the Next Time?
       I saw value in both sides of this argument, however I do feel it was a little easier to support the pro side because of personal bias. A future challenge would be presenting and supporting an argument that I personally do not believe in.
Conclusion

	Overall, I feel that the Magnet status debate was well understood, raising current health care issues to the forefront. Judging by the content of the responses, participants shared the desire to pursue excellent patient care and healthy work place environments… Magnet status or not.