Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
The Concept Map you are trying to access has information related to:
theory development, well done?, the theory likely change the practice of organizational sicence in this area?, the argument have any glaring flaws?, solutions proposed for remedying alleged deficiencies in current theories?, percenatege of academic readers are interested in the topic?, a value added contribution, your underlying logic and supporting evidence compelling?, who cares?, impact on research, considerations, when, what, how, why, timeliness, questions to publishability of a paper, the arguments reflect a broad, current understanding of the subject?, not to tweak a conceptual model in ways that are of little consequence, why so?, relevance, clarity of expression, long enough to cover the topic, but short enough to be interesting, based on a foundation of convincing argumentation and agrounded in reasonable, explicit views of human nature and organizational practice, level of theorizing (general versus middle level), so what?, well written, linkages to research evident, alter research practice, why now?, factors considered in judging conceptual papers, logically, the paper's format and content consistent with the specifications, what's new?, of contemporary intrest, seasoned thinking (completeness and throughness), radicalness of the proposal, done well?