Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
The Concept Map you are trying to access has information related to:
Real Evidence Part 2.3 ss 52-54 Real Evidence s52 - CL applies if not contra this part 2.3 relevance & authentication, s53(4)prohibits experiments s53(5) allows views of exhibits difference? Kozul v R - unloaded revover proving accidental discharge beyond oservation & testing = new evidence but Judge's warning enough to overcome, s53(4)prohibits experiments s53(5) allows views of exhibits s52-54 - Views, judge may grant upon application, give chance for parties to be present, not prejudicial s54- views are evidence case, Real Evidence s52 - CL applies if not contra this part 2.3 relevance & authentication s53(4)prohibits experiments s53(5) allows views of exhibits, s52 - CL applies if not contra this part 2.3 relevance & authentication s53(4)prohibits experiments s53(5) allows views of exhibits difference?, s52 - CL applies if not contra this part 2.3 relevance & authentication s53(4)prohibits experiments s53(5) allows views of exhibits s52-54 - Views, judge may grant upon application, give chance for parties to be present, not prejudicial s54- views are evidence, s52-54 - Views, judge may grant upon application, give chance for parties to be present, not prejudicial s54- views are evidence case R v Milat - view allowed, give chance for parties to be there but parties need not be there, not prejudicial, misleading or waste of time