Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: modus ponens, John has a perfect alibi therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) John cannot be the murderer, if we assume that reflection shows that the alibi-argu- ment is more con- vincing than the other one, then the task is to figure out what is wrong with the original argument. In this situation it is possible to falsify the original warrant, as in the following reformu- lation of the original argument. Of course, it is still possible that one of the premises of this argument is wrong contradicts John committed the murder, not q therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) p, you want to maintain a good reputation therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) give only honest advice, p → q therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) q, watering a flower is a necessary condition for its growth therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) it gets enough water, John did not committ the murder therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) it is false that if someone's fingerprints are on a mur- der weapon, then this is a sufficient condition for the fact that this person committed the murder, you study hard therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) you will excel in school, p is a necessary condition for q therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) p, If someone has a perfect alibi, this person cannot be the murderer therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) John cannot be the murderer, you will be admitted to medical school only if you have taken organic chemistry therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) you have taken orga- nic chemistry, the cable electrocuted the man therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) he died, p therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) q, if we assume that reflection shows that the alibi-argu- ment is more con- vincing than the other one, then the task is to figure out what is wrong with the original argument. In this situation it is possible to falsify the original warrant, as in the following reformu- lation of the original argument. Of course, it is still possible that one of the premises of this argument is wrong contradicts John cannot be the murderer, if we assume that reflection shows that the alibi-argu- ment is more con- vincing than the other one, then the task is to figure out what is wrong with the original argument. In this situation it is possible to falsify the original warrant, as in the following reformu- lation of the original argument. Of course, it is still possible that one of the premises of this argument is wrong therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) it is false that if someone's fingerprints are on a mur- der weapon, then this is a sufficient condition for the fact that this person committed the murder, p therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) q, electrocution is a sufficient condition for dying therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) he died, p therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) q, If someone is a rational human being, then this person is responsible for what he or she does therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) Paul is responsible for what he did, p therefore (ArgScheme: modus ponens) q