Warning:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this page will work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: 13.2 Lab 2 THUGS, The number of drunk drivers ages 16-18 will be increased. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens Lowering the MLDA increases alcohol related automobile fatalities., People ages 16-18 in states with lower MLDA were less likely to abstain from alcohol than People ages 16-18 in states where the MLDA is 21(1) Supports If the drinking age is lower than 21 then the alcohol consumption among ages 16-18 will be increased., People ages 16-18 in states with lower MLDA drank significantly more often than people ages 16-18 in states where the MLDA is 21(1) Supports If the drinking age is lower than 21 then the alcohol consumption among ages 16-18 will be increased., Federal agencies warn us that “Exposing the brain to alcohol during this period (i.e, before age 21) may interrupt key processes of brain development” and “alcohol–induced brain damage may persist.” Supports Lowering the MLDA will increase drug and alcohol addiction and cause developmental problems., According to the NIH decreasing the MLDA to 18 in the 1970's resulted in a 15% increase in alcohol related automobile fatalities.(1) Supports Lowering the MLDA increases alcohol related automobile fatalities., The alcohol consumption among ages 16-18 will be increased. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens The number of drunk drivers ages 16-18 will be increased., The alcohol consumption among ages 16-18 will be increased. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens If the alcohol consumption among ages 16-18 will be increased then the number of drunk drivers ages 16-18 will be increased., Lowering the MLDA will increase drug and alcohol addiction and cause developmental problems. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens The drinking age should not be lowered to 18., The drinking age lower than 21. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens The alcohol consumption among ages 16-18 will be increased., The number of drunk drivers ages 16-18 will be increased. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens If the number of drunk drivers ages 16-18 will be increased then the number of alcohol related automobile fatalities will be increased., The drinking age lower than 21. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens If the drinking age is lower than 21 then the alcohol consumption among ages 16-18 will be increased., According to the CDC, Increasing the drinking age to 21 reduced alcohol related fatalities among ages 16-20 by 63%.(2) Supports Lowering the MLDA increases alcohol related automobile fatalities., Lowering the MLDA increases alcohol related automobile fatalities. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens The drinking age should not be lowered to 18., If owering the MLDA will increase drug and alcohol addiction and cause developmental problems then the drinking age should not be lowered to 18. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens The drinking age should not be lowered to 18., 65% of drivers 15-20 incvolved in fatal traffic accidents with a BAC of .08 or higher died as a result of the crash. ???? If the number of drunk drivers ages 16-18 will be increased then the number of alcohol related automobile fatalities will be increased., Adults age 21 or older who first used alcohol before age 21 we more likely than adults who had their first drink at age 21 or older to be classified with alcohol dependance or abuse (9.6% vs 2.1%)(3) therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens The drinking age should not be lowered to 18., Lowering the MLDA increases alcohol related automobile fatalities. therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens If lowering the MLDA increases alcohol related automobile fatalities then the drinking age should not be lowered to 18., People ages 16-18 in states with lower MLDA were drunk more often than People ages 16-18 in states where the MLDA is 21(1) Supports If the drinking age is lower than 21 then the alcohol consumption among ages 16-18 will be increased., Adults age 21 or older who first used alcohol before age 21 we more likely than adults who had their first drink at age 21 or older to be classified with alcohol dependance or abuse (9.6% vs 2.1%)(3) therefore ArgScheme: Modus Ponens If Adults age 21 or older who first used alcohol before age 21 we more likely than adults who had their first drink at age 21 or older to be classified with alcohol dependance or abuse (9.6% vs 2.1%)(3) then the drinking age should not be lowered to 18.