WARNING:
JavaScript is turned OFF. None of the links on this concept map will
work until it is reactivated.
If you need help turning JavaScript On, click here.
This Concept Map, created with IHMC CmapTools, has information related to: BAAM 2017 Case for Syntax - 6, autoclitic frames and relational autoclitics of order present dificulties for such an explanation because the sequences are of types (classes) of responses that are controlled not by the preceding response itself, but by the relation between the responses., Reason number 1: The field of linguistics is ready for a BA treatment of syntax It is well known that in American linguistics, research has centered around finding innate properties of language., "Usage Based" learning theory is popular. It is based on associations of responses with exemplars., each position in the autoclitic frame is a "tact" of the relation of the primary response in that position to the other responses in the frame. Therefore, describing the relations "tacted" helps identify the controlling stimuli of each constituent of an autoclitic sequence., Reason number 3: A BA treatment can account for the classes of complex verbal responses i.e., the classes of phrases, clauses, and constructions that are apparent in verbal repertoires., autoclitic frames may be emitted within other autoclitic frames. Thus, "structure" can be viewed as the arrangement of autoclitic sequences in a verbal response., in American linguistics, research has centered around finding innate properties of language. It is less well known that such theories have always had their detractors,, Background: What is syntax? Answer: Syntax concerns the sequences of the components of complex verbal responses., this is the idea implied by the relational autoclitic of order such that responses in a sequence are under control of more than just the preceding stimuli, Linguists typically describe regular sequences in terms of "rules" However, rules do not explain, they describe., rules do not explain, they describe. At times, linguists have tried to explain rules as being innate, or deriving from innate capacity., topographies of verbal responses seem to repeat their patterns; give examples, the "structure" of an utterance is the arrangement of its phrases, clauses, and other constructions. However, these constituents are the response products of autoclitic frames (autoclitic sequencing responses)., Reason number 1: The field of linguistics is ready for a BA treatment of syntax this means that linguists are looking for an explanation based on a learning theory., the sequences are of types (classes) of responses that are controlled not by the preceding response itself, but by the relation between the responses. Note that this is the idea implied by the relational autoclitic of order, different relations entail different controlling variables, different classes of responses are formed. These classes Translate into the variety of constructions found in any language., this regularity has been attributed to chaining or intraverbal responding. However, autoclitic frames and relational autoclitics of order present dificulties for such an explanation, in relational autoclitics of order, the positions of the constituent responses are SDs for relations between the primary responses. So, because different relations entail different controlling variables, different classes of responses are formed., in relational autoclitics of order, the positions of the constituent responses are SDs for relations between the primary responses. give examples, Reason number 4: A BA treatment can account for the apparent "structure" of language. Note that the "structure" of an utterance is the arrangement of its phrases, clauses, and other constructions.